Zimmerman, along with Uber and Lyft, favor a much simpler version they say is more understandable: “You lose this, you lose this, you lose this,” he told the Austin American-Statesman, “and you gain nothing.” 20151217-075 relating to Transportation Network Companies and replace (it) with an ordinance that would repeal and prohibit required fingerprinting, repeal the requirement to identify the vehicle with a distinctive emblem, repeal the prohibition against loading and unloading passengers in a travel lane, and require other regulations for Transportation Network Companies?ĭistrict 6 Councilman Don Zimmerman also finds the wording to be unclear.
#Clarify language austin texas code
Shall the City Code be amended to repeal City Ordinance No. The current ballot language is as follows: … The approved ballot language is purposely skewed to persuade the public to vote against the proposition.” “That portrayal could not be further from the truth. “The council falsely portrayed the proposed ordinance as something that only takes away and does not give,” Phelp argued in her court filing. But Phelps and others say that the ballot language is too confusing, and was designed as such by the city in order to sway voters. In May, citizens will be given the chance to vote on the regulations.
#Clarify language austin texas drivers
The Austin City Council voted 9-2 in December to regulate Uber and Lyft drivers similarly to the taxicab industry, requiring them to pass the city’s 10 point fingerprint-based background checks.
But the court sided with the city and denied her request without comment on Monday.Ī battle against Uber and Lyft, led by District 5 Councilwoman Ann Kitchen, resulted in restrictions on rideshare companies. Phelps, backed by Uber, argued the ballot language was unclear and misleading.
0 kommentar(er)
